[151057] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Concern about gTLD servers in India
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Sat Mar 10 11:19:37 2012
In-Reply-To: <CAJ0+aXZ7JdjDBPzJw12_s+8LcSZBB_TpQpUF=BA=zsT27EB=Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:35:48 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Sure, if you can find a datacenter that's capable of handling all the
traffic, and has staff who are able to provide efficient remote hands for
huge racks of extremely powerful servers .. and are possibly also open to
cross subsidizing the costs that GTLD operators will incur to host
instances of their servers in India .. etc etc.
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Anurag Bhatia <me@anuragbhatia.com> wrote:
> Please don't create confusions.
>
> I didn't made any assertion. I mentioned issue with India, but Graham came
> with point that issue is similar in Africa. Good point if he knows that.
> Certainly relevent to issue I mentioned for India.
>
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
