[151032] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Sat Mar 10 02:02:52 2012
From: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:01:54 +0000
In-Reply-To: <4A0A5B49-3E64-458C-B745-9A873A6A2DAA@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> I haven't heard anyone advocate accepting less than a /48. I think /48
> is a reasonable "You must be this tall to ride" barrier.
>=20
> Beyond that, YMMV.
>=20
> Owen
Apparently AS6939 has at various times :) I remember getting some /64 anno=
uncements from HE. I haven't seen one lately, though. I'm only filtering =
one /64 route these days announced by AS4651=20
