[151020] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Mar 9 23:47:42 2012

From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAAwwbW9vxxB1rgn6YthkvJ_rL3kF_y4frEdbOzbbrp-L+oi7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 20:45:40 -0800
To: Jimmy Hess <mysidia@gmail.com>
Cc: Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

> 
> (4) Any of the other methods of achieving multi-homing,  such as
> originating an NLRI with a longer prefix than the RIR delegation,
> should be rejected by filters.
> 
>> Owen
> --
> -JH

It is very rare that I will quote Randy Bush. Even more so when his
original quote was utterly misplaced in the original context.

However, in this case I will make an exception...

"We don't need policy weenies telling us how to run our networks."
--Randy Bush (from APNIC Policy SIG discussion of Prop-098)

Owen



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post