[151017] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Fri Mar 9 22:10:54 2012
From: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com>
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:10:05 +0000
In-Reply-To: <70180960-F3F6-40B6-97D5-1763D16DF42F@steffann.nl>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Deaggregating to /48's is not a good idea, but giving an LIR a few bits
> (something like 3 or 4) to deaggregate makes sense.
>=20
> - Sander
>=20
+1
I wouldn't have a problem with a few bits of disaggregation. That seems rea=
sonable for a network that might be subject to partitioning or doesn't have=
a fully meshed internal net.
