[151001] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 routing table incomplete!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Miller)
Fri Mar 9 15:54:33 2012
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:53:37 -0500
From: David Miller <dmiller@tiggee.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <4F5A66A0.60902@kenweb.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/9/2012 3:22 PM, ML wrote:
> Not so shocking for people on this list..However after playing around
> with a single-homed v6 connection to Cogent I was a little surprised
> to not be missing just HE routes.
>
> Apparently Google and Cogent aren't playing nice as I've been unable
> to reach a number of Google's AAAAs for ipv6.google.com a quick check
> for paths with _15169_ came up empty.
>
> I figured Cogent and Google would be playing nice by now but
> apparently there is still a rift between these two from May of last
> year. At least it appears that is when people started noticing
> weirdness.
>
> Has anyone been documenting who has holes in their BGP tables and to
> where?
>
> P.S
>
> Also don't seen OCCAID from Cogent...maybe Cogent doesn't like tunnel
> brokers??
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_IPv6_support_by_major_transit_providers
-DMM
