[150999] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Vegoda)
Fri Mar 9 15:46:30 2012
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@icann.org>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Jeff Wheeler <jsw@inconcepts.biz>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:45:18 -0800
In-Reply-To: <B57F2B01-4C06-45C1-8D2A-655A66B4152F@delong.com>
Cc: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>, NANOG Mailing List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Owen wrote:
[...]
> In the ARIN region I think we have pretty well prevented this last issue
> with current policy. I tried to propose similar policy in the APNIC regio=
n,
> but it was not well accepted there. The folks in Asia seem t want to clin=
g
> to their scarcity mentality in IPv6 for the time being. I believe RIPE is
> issuing reasonably generous IPv6 allocations/assignments. I don't
> know enough about the goings on in AfriNIC or LACNIC to comment
> with any certainty.
You can see the prefix distribution in charts that are updated daily on our=
stats web site:
http://stats.research.icann.org/
HTH,
Leo
