[150990] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bernhard Schmidt)
Fri Mar 9 11:09:16 2012
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:08:03 +0100
From: Bernhard Schmidt <berni@birkenwald.de>
To: PC <paul4004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJAdsDmydXjTJw=K4SuQq9CAGtvOqupNwzdsziMn7EwnHZXu6w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 09.03.2012 17:04, PC wrote:
> I think ARIN issues /48s for Provider independent space as the
> minimum allocation size, so I'm guessing we shouldn't filter below
> that. At least, that's what's in their current policies.
Note that I explicitly wrote:
| I used to be (or still am) on the same page as you are. I was
| dropping everything smaller than a /36 from PA ranges at the edge.
^^^^^^^
Of course I'm accepting /48 from PI range (in ARIN world 2001:500::/30
2001:504::/30 and 2620::/23), anything else would be quite brain-dead
and stupid.
Bernhard
