[150875] in North American Network Operators' Group
did AS174 and AS4134 de-peer?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John van Oppen)
Wed Mar 7 02:24:02 2012
From: John van Oppen <jvanoppen@spectrumnet.us>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 07:23:04 +0000
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
All -
I was noticing that it appears from our Seattle-based full route feed from =
cogent that they may have de-peered AS4134 (or vise-versa)... anyone know=
anything about this? We noticed this recently in a shift of traffic awa=
y from cogent for traffic to and from china telecom... Now cogent's path =
is _174_1239_4134_.
In any case, was just wondering if anyone had noticed this. AS4134 is one=
that often generates NOC calls on our end due to their often saturated pee=
rs to any number of other upstreams and the cogent route had been remarkabl=
y uncongested previously so it is sad to see it disappear.
Thanks,
John @ AS11404.
