[150860] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IETF - Overlapping IPv4 Address Support
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Morris)
Tue Mar 6 17:04:57 2012
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:03:47 -0500
From: Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203061620200.18452@whammy.cluebyfour.org>
Reply-To: swm@emanon.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hell, years ago, I only wanted to add three bits and give a set to each
continent with one leftover for the United Federation of Planets (and
Antarctica really didn't need one anyway)...
I was told that would be geographically discriminating! :)
Ah well, c'est la vie! Why be lazy when we can be more complicated?
Scott
On 3/6/12 4:22 PM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Guru NANOG wrote:
>
>> Adding four more bits to the Left of the Source Address and setting
>> those bits to 1111 (0xF) can help to start the migration to "Regions"
>> and more IPv4 Addresses - Using and Re-Using legacy
>> spectrum
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.txt
>>
>
> Drugs are bad, mmmmmkay?
>
> *plonk*
>
> jms
>
>
>
