[150637] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco ME3400
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ramanpreet Singh)
Tue Feb 28 22:45:52 2012
In-Reply-To: <922ACC42D498884AA02B3565688AF99534053132DB@USEXMBS01.mwd.h2o>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:44:50 -0800
From: Ramanpreet Singh <sikandar.raman@gmail.com>
To: "Holmes,David A" <dholmes@mwdh2o.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Checkout me3600/me3800 ngn metro boxes which supports service level/efp
configuration. Also commonly known as cisco's evc infrastructute currently
supported on 7600 with es+ cards and asr 9k.
I dont think there is any other box from cost prespective which supports
most of the desired metro features as me3600/3800 does.
On Feb 28, 2012 4:08 PM, "Holmes,David A" <dholmes@mwdh2o.com> wrote:
> Anyone with advice on the ME3400 which some telcos use for Metro Ethernet
> Forum (MEF) services? Specifically looking for layer2 vs layer 3. At Layer
> 2 NNI/UNI vs dot1q qinq vs private VLANs. At Layer 3 multiple VRF CE/PE
> support. Specifically which connectivity options have been found to be most
> reliable and scalable.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> This communication, together with any attachments or embedded links, is
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information
> that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying,
> dissemination, distribution or use of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> the sender immediately by return e-mail message and delete the original and
> all copies of the communication, along with any attachments or embedded
> links, from your system.
>
