[150502] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: do not filter your customers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tom Hill)
Sat Feb 25 13:05:23 2012
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:04:20 +0000
From: Tom Hill <tom@ninjabadger.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <33004.1330190410@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 25/02/12 17:20, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:39:37 EST, Christopher Morrow said:
>
>> The knobs available are sort of harsh all the way around though today :(
>
> So what would be a good knob if it was available? I've seen about forty-leven
> people say the current knobs suck, but no real proposals of "what would really
> rock is if we could...."
I've suggested before that a configured increase limit, in percentage
might be *slightly* more intelligent than the current hard limit
settings (i.e. max-prefixes).
Typically you're going to get, what, 100 routes? Maybe less, maybe more.
If that rises by 100%, drop the session. Weird customer? 200%.
Tom
