[150373] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Most energy efficient (home) setup

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen van Aart)
Wed Feb 22 17:39:21 2012

Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:38:19 -0800
From: Jeroen van Aart <jeroen@mompl.net>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <F864B4AC-45E5-4AC6-AF04-DB8E5120DC70@ukbroadband.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Leigh Porter wrote:
> You dudes need to get with the times and put all this stuff in the cloud.
> Ok so I joke a little.. 

The "cloud" seems to be a more modern implementation of the mainframe 
"paradigm" (and now I feel soiled having used 2 such words in one 
sentence). It has its uses, though it's interesting to see how things go 
full circle. I predict a move away from "the cloud" in about a decade, 
give or take.

> The only thing I keep at home now is storage.

I do have a few virtual private servers (and use them) and have set up a 
few VPS serving servers myself. However it's fun to tinker with hardware 
and if I'd migrate as much as possible to VPS systems it'd take a big 
chunk of the fun out of it.

As a side note, the main reasons for me to have a more energy efficient 
setup is not to "go green" (there are better ways for that) but because 
it is a fun challenge, I dislike paying bigger bills, and I hate the 
clutter and the noise a big setup brings.

Greetings,
Jeroen

-- 
Earthquake Magnitude: 3.2
Date: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 22:00:06 UTC
Location: Central Alaska
Latitude: 62.0453; Longitude: -152.4945
Depth: 10.90 km


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post