[149923] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Common operational misconceptions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Feb 16 20:44:54 2012
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:11:22 +0900."
<4F3DA93A.3060904@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:43:31 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1329443011_99309P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:11:22 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
> While NAT breaks the end to end connectivity, it can be
> restored by end systems by reversing translations by NAT,
> if proper information on the translations are obtained
> through some protocol such as UPnP.
You got a front end NAT. You got 3 boxes behind it that all
want to listen for inbound connections on port 49734.
Let me know how that works out for you.
--==_Exmh_1329443011_99309P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQIVAwUBTz2wwwdmEQWDXROgAQIqgw/+MDLutF8RJCXIaPSu1NwZsWO47ZZG2xb2
c+tBpFy/1lnHzGil2vXSZioNv5qVzuVCvbquwTQzClcoRkVdM6ImncR7C3+SObs2
jIujqCNZqd02QFkpLsNit34Wk9FpCgEy/49jlp51npA90rhtZjsFiSoNlAFOWwx9
+U0O5DZVKQDRYYYQUWgOZhI9Qxy9/rQ66xneVSgHPcCtObg45rDMit9U868EBa4U
fg/qznzXv1JZFgK82gt6nD6xP4iLxjCAj3JI9b0ryR00TsGIwecPgod2en4Q0O24
e/MlIi3nA/nYnH/CQoDTpLB9YyWPulz/V7GTIy7SX3acpaB1B/AeZqc+3nx8dDbu
BH+sMjCprFxDruiAax9m4jlbLqyEgenbHhLGJX0A+VZYLZjXNrZZDJxxyZCAmmW4
wPtbOMA/aAiseCCAeVzikfKA33mYjMw7TjTAUopsCPWapp4FZL0d0uZPOTHIwp45
mNcWkjCVplKnQudUBAPnhDJuqQ5zb7kcs2LrpSQT5ewkHz2fADa1W7JjdLxWsMcg
z/Y79UgLcthzGWpqSEUbhX6TqM63ginjw2uKnHYafcEKanJ9i0ybaeeDedqAWIXp
YsHevb34yAzUsbmCxq/s/Y0O2mKS8te4MjLZZuCKkpz5gaLLh/YIBcZ/oV7286rh
oZoaJBFpKBs=
=ZN52
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1329443011_99309P--
