[149802] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wireless Recommendations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel jaeggli)
Wed Feb 15 23:43:24 2012
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:41:10 -0800
From: Joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Mario Eirea <meirea@charterschoolit.com>
In-Reply-To: <C95B38A68C80744C8B371447DB6EE98C042796@CSIT-SRV-MBX-01.charterschoolit.local>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/15/12 20:14 , Mario Eirea wrote:
> This is my guess too, i guess there is some bleed over from their antenna arrays.
Even the most directional sector antenna in the world has a back lobe...
and there there's the clients...
there's no magic bullet you simply can't do it all in one ap with the
space available.
> Mario Eirea
> IT Department
> Charter School IT
> 20803 Johnson Street
> Pembroke Pines, FL 33029
> Ph: 954-435-7827
> Cell: 305-742-6524
> Fax: 954-442-1762
> ________________________________________
> From: Jonathan Lassoff [jof@thejof.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 10:54 PM
> To: Faisal@snappydsl.net
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Wireless Recommendations
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <faisal@snappydsl.net> wrote:
>> Is that because of Channel Spacing ? or some other reason ?
>
> I would presume channel spacing. In FCC-land, there are only 3
> non-overlapping 20 Mhz bandwidths available.
>
> --j
>
>
>
