[149790] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Common operational misconceptions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Bertrand)
Wed Feb 15 21:17:35 2012
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:16:35 -0500
From: Steve Bertrand <steve.bertrand@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
In-Reply-To: <8C26A4FDAE599041A13EB499117D3C286B7B6C94@ex-mb-2.corp.atlasnetworks.us>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2012.02.15 19:55, Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
>> IPv6 is operational.
>
> How is this a misconception? It works fine for me...
Imagine an operator who is v6 ignorant, with a home provider who
implements v6 half-assed, and tries to access a v6 site that has perhaps
v6-only accessible nameservers, when their provider who 'offers' v6 has
resolvers that operate only over v4.
*huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho).
Steve
