[149782] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Common operational misconceptions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Sinatra)
Wed Feb 15 19:48:56 2012
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:46:44 -0800
From: Michael Sinatra <michael@rancid.berkeley.edu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20120215144715.18e65a55@w520.localdomain>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
ULA is the IPv6 equivalent of RFC1918
RFCs are standards (i.e. all of them, or RFC is synonymous with standard)
The words "Internet" and "Web" can be used interchangeably
Not only does NAT provide "security," but it's NECESSARY for "security."
Alternatively, you can't possibly be as secure without NAT than with.
Link capacity is how fast the bits move through the wire
Security is the responsibility of the Security Group
