[149713] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 explicit BGP group configs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aleksi Suhonen)
Sun Feb 12 23:51:48 2012
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:50:51 +0200
From: Aleksi Suhonen <nanog-poster@axu.tm>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hello,
keith tokash wrote:
> I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
> any, benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups.
> We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered;
I haven't really looked very hard, since I subscribe to the stated
reasons for keeping v4 and v6 sessions apart. (migration, max-pfx, ...)
BUT
To my knowledge, JunOS doesn't even support using a single TCP session
to exchange routes of all address families. If someone knows how to do
this - if even for just IPv4 and IPv6 unicast - let me know ... ;-)
--
Aleksi Suhonen / Axu TM Oy
World Wide Web: www.axu.tm
