[149568] in North American Network Operators' Group
IPv6 explicit BGP group configs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (keith tokash)
Wed Feb 8 12:00:15 2012
From: keith tokash <ktokash@hotmail.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:59:23 -0800
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Hi=2C
I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what=2C if
any=2C benefit there is to splitting v4 and v6 into separate groups. =20
We're running Junipers and things are fairly neat and ordered=3B we have=20
multiple links to a few providers in many sites=2C so we group them and=20
apply the policies at the group level. We could stick the new v6=20
neighbors into the same group and apply the policies at the neighbor=20
level=2C or create new groups (i.e. Level3 and Level3v6).
This=20
might sound a little nit-picky=2C but I'm concerned that there's a nuance=20
I'm not thinking of right now and I don't want to be "that guy" who puts
something in place and is cursed for a decade.
Thanks=2C
Keith Tokash =
