[149348] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AS8300 - Swisscom hijacking.. Just what are you testing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Wed Feb 1 19:27:14 2012
In-Reply-To: <4F29B8D4.6040603@unfix.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 05:56:15 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
It is "brilliant" because you can kiss goodbye to multihoming if you
have, say, a /24 that you want to hang off, say, L3 and cogent.
You'd get the covering L3 /9 announcement is all, visible to swisscom ..
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> wrote:
>
> They do internal aggregation of common prefixes to keep their internal
> tables small, see for instance this rather old preso:
>
> http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.ppt
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
