[149327] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Eisenberg)
Wed Feb 1 15:17:27 2012

From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
To: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:16:23 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20120201201012.GE10680@hiwaay.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

> AFAIK there's no law covering the use of what party X considers their
> 32 bit numbers (assigned by party A) by party Y.
=20
So, to pose the obvious question: Should there be?

(I honestly don't know the answer is to this question, and am asking in ear=
nest for opinions on the subject)

Nathan




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post