[149231] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 BGP MIBs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Tue Jan 31 11:47:52 2012
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:47:19 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: chip <chip.gwyn@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABGzhdv6+pWxg95+Sku4C0-JdhRdZYGBmH+0Lfd9_uouCX8S6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 31/01/2012 16:42, chip wrote:
> Can anyone point me to ongoing discussion about IPv6 BGP SNMP MIBs
> going on in the IETF? As I understand it RFC 4293 was somewhat
> abandoned by most vendors. Cisco has a new BGPV4-2 Mib but that still
> doesn't address all the needs. While I can try and push all my
> vendors to come up with a MIB that has parity with IPv4 I assume our
> standards bodies are working towards that goal as well. I can't seem
> to locate where these discussions are happening within the IETF...or
> if they even are. Any pointers or education for my ignorance is
> appreciated.
bgp4-mibv2: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2
Nick
