[149209] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Console Server Recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Tue Jan 31 01:39:45 2012
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:39:19 +0800
In-Reply-To: <CALFTrnOinwxic_uz+AjpmnGq=ryTgupH5D5pexRt13bCTD07Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: mtinka@globaltransit.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart2359248.g9N7I5VyPf
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:08:45 AM Ray Soucy wrote:
> What are people using for console servers these days?=20
> We've historically used retired routers with ASYNC
> ports, but it's time for an upgrade.
Cisco 2811.
Mark.
--nextPart2359248.g9N7I5VyPf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=ZfWG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart2359248.g9N7I5VyPf--
