|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <043e01ccdf90$38c96870$aa5c3950$@impactbusiness.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:04:05 -0800 From: Jonathan Lassoff <jof@thejof.com> To: Jim Gonzalez <jim@impactbusiness.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Jim Gonzalez <jim@impactbusiness.com> wro= te: > Hi, > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I am looking for a Wireless bridge or Rout= er that will > support 600 wireless clients concurrently (mostly cell phones). =A0I need= it > for a proof of concept. I've had some great luck with a variety of vendors, though never with this many clients on one AP. For a stable 802.11 stack, I've found Cisco AP1142N's to be great. That said, I'm not sure what you're trying to do here, but I think you'll be disappointed with any AP with 600 *active* stations associated to it. No AP can work around the congestive collapse of hundreds of stations all transmitting RTS frames at once. If you can split up your many stations across a swath of APs, bridging down to a couple L2 Ethernet LANs, I think you'll get something much more scalable. Cheers, jof
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |