[149170] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Console Server Recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (PC)
Mon Jan 30 12:14:53 2012
In-Reply-To: <4F26C4AB.9050204@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:14:00 -0700
From: PC <paul4004@gmail.com>
To: -Hammer- <bhmccie@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Love the boxes. Absolutely despise the ~50 mhz processor they put in them
that takes 10 seconds to negotiate SSH.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:26 AM, -Hammer- <bhmccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> Avocent Cyclades ACS. Enterprise class.
>
> http://www.avocent.com/**Products/Category/Serial_**Appliances.aspx<http://www.avocent.com/Products/Category/Serial_Appliances.aspx>
>
> -Hammer-
>
> "I was a normal American nerd"
> -Jack Herer
>
>
>
>
> On 1/30/2012 10:08 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
>
>> What are people using for console servers these days? We've
>> historically used retired routers with ASYNC ports, but it's time for
>> an upgrade.
>>
>> OpenGear seems to have some nice stuff, anyone else?
>>
>>
>
