[149152] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rodrick Brown)
Mon Jan 30 07:01:33 2012
In-Reply-To: <20120129222721.GA4622@gweep.net>
From: Rodrick Brown <rodrick.brown@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:00:15 -0500
To: "nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net" <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 29, 2012, at 5:27 PM, Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 08:02:28PM -0200, Alvaro Pereira wrote:
>> And note that the Juniper EX2500 does not run JUNOS, it is just an OEM bo=
x
>> from someone else...
>=20
> Blade Networks, now IBM.
If I remember correctly I believe Blade Networks licenses the same fulcrum A=
SIC's as the Arista's.
>>=20
>> Alvaro
>>=20
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:23, Tim Vollebregt <tim@interworx.nl> wrote:
>>=20
>>> 2,5MB shared approximately.
>>>=20
>>> Aggregating 10G with microbursts is definately a no-go on such box.
>>>=20
>>> -Tim
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On 27-01-12 12:33, James Braunegg wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ??
>>>>=20
>>>> Kindest Regards
>>>>=20
>>>> James Braunegg
>>>> W: 1300 769 972 | M: 0488 997 207 | D: (03) 9751 7616
>>>> E: james.braunegg@micron21.com | ABN: 12 109 977 666
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain
>>>> privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended
>>>> recipient of this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclos=
e it
>>>> to anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this message i=
n
>>>> error please return the message to the sender by replying to it and the=
n
>>>> delete the message from your computer.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:tim@interworx.nl]
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM
>>>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>>>> Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
>>>>=20
>>>> I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really=
>>>> small buffers.
>>>>=20
>>>> EX3300 as TOR
>>>> EX82** as 10G aggregator
>>>>=20
>>>> -Tim
>>>>=20
>>>> On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> Juniper EX4500.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> -RR
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2000@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test
>>>>>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>=20
>>>=20
>=20
> --=20
> RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE / NewNOG
>=20
