[149054] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was Re: 10G switch recommendaton)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bas)
Fri Jan 27 16:40:56 2012
In-Reply-To: <20120127165515.GA2697@pob.ytti.fi>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:40:03 +0100
From: bas <kilobit@gmail.com>
To: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> wrote:
> On (2012-01-27 17:35 +0100), bas wrote:
> But generally nice list, especially the 10GE fixed config looked realistic,
> sometimes I wish we'd have 'dpreview' style page for routers and switches,
> especially now with dozen or more vendors selling 'same' trident+ switch,
> differentiating them is hard.
But do you generally agree that "the market" has a requirement for a
deep-buffer TOR switch?
Or am I crazy for thinking that my customers need such a solution?
Bas
