[148998] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: 10G switchrecommendaton
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Braunegg)
Fri Jan 27 06:34:42 2012
From: James Braunegg <james.braunegg@micron21.com>
To: Tim Vollebregt <tim@interworx.nl>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:33:11 +0000
In-Reply-To: <4F226FD9.4050104@interworx.nl>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
How small is the buffer on the EX4500 ??
Kindest Regards
James Braunegg
W:=A0 1300 769 972=A0 |=A0 M:=A0 0488 997 207 |=A0 D:=A0 (03) 9751 7616
E:=A0=A0 james.braunegg@micron21.com=A0 |=A0 ABN:=A0 12 109 977 666=A0=A0=20
This message is intended for the addressee named above. It may contain priv=
ileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient o=
f this message you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose it to anyone =
other than the addressee. If you have received this message in error please=
return the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the mes=
sage from your computer.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Vollebregt [mailto:tim@interworx.nl]=20
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 8:35 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
I would not recommend EX4500 as an 10G aggregator switch, it has really sma=
ll buffers.
EX3300 as TOR
EX82** as 10G aggregator
-Tim
On 26-01-12 22:13, Raul Rodriguez wrote:
> Juniper EX4500.
>
> -RR
>
> On 1/26/12, Deric Kwok<deric.kwok2000@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test=20
>> around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port!
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
