[148988] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 10G switchrecommendaton
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Grant Ridder)
Fri Jan 27 03:55:06 2012
In-Reply-To: <9C40116D-53A4-41E5-BB4D-101820B2A7D7@A2B-Internet.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 02:54:19 -0600
From: Grant Ridder <shortdudey123@gmail.com>
To: Erik Bais <ebais@a2b-internet.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I have experience with the Extreme's Alpine, Blackdiamond, x250, and x450
and i discovered that the command line is fairly different than Cisco, HP,
or Dell. However, since they are a relatively small company with a small
but strong customer base, their support is fairly good. I can't speak for
10G/40G implementations, but from my experiences, they support has a quick
response time and they do quite a bit of lab replication to figure out the
exact root cause.
-Grant
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Erik Bais <ebais@a2b-internet.com> wrote:
> We have a full purple network, so my answer for this would be Extreme
> Networks.
>
> Check out the Lipis report on the X670 / x670v 48 port 10G 1U switches.
>
> vs other vendor equipment :
>
> http://www.extremenetworks.com/libraries/products/ExtremeX670V_Lippis%20Report_Fall.pdf
>
>
> Regards,
> Erik Bais
>
> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
>
> Op Jan 26, 2012 om 21:20 heeft Deric Kwok <deric.kwok2000@gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton
> > Ipref software can test around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G
> > in single port!
> >
> > Thank you
> >
>
>
