[148884] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T and IPv6 Launch
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Ewing)
Wed Jan 25 18:18:53 2012
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:18:07 -0600
From: Brandon Ewing <nicotine@warningg.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <7A66826C-489D-41B8-810F-88EBEE7B7856@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 06:52:05PM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> So i have been privately referred to att.com/ipv6 where you can find supp=
orting CPE devices.=20
>=20
> It sounds like if you have equipment supporting ipv6 it may just appear o=
ne day "soon".=20
>=20
> Jared Mauch
That's slightly depressing. From their Residential Q&A:
Devices supporting IPv6
Pace 4111N=20
Netgear 7550 B90=20
Netgear 6200 A90=20
Motorola 3360
Only AT&T-certified versions of the devices listed above will be able to
utilize IPv6 on the AT&T network.
I have my own DSL modem, that I know has IPv6 support. Will AT&T be doing
some sort of wizardry to ensure it will work for their CPE, but not mine?
--=20
Brandon Ewing (nicotine@warningg.com)
--JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFPII2v7UrjtO3ToYoRArtEAJ46bwT7DJqrIPPckjtb8GNNDrpMjwCeLnOm
WmhxUNzzXL9CGPcfKfryYzg=
=5mN/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--JwB53PgKC5A7+0Ej--
