[148861] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dave Pooser)
Wed Jan 25 11:35:58 2012
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:34:53 -0600
From: Dave Pooser <dave.nanog@alfordmedia.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F202D9D.4060002@foobar.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 1/25/12 10:28 AM, "Nick Hilliard" <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
>I wish you luck selling this notion to enterprise network people, most of
>who appear to believe that rfc1918 address space is a feature, not a bug.
Until they've gone through an M&A where they had to connect multiple sites
using overlapping RFC1918 space, of course. Then the idea of globally
unique addressing, even if it's not globally routable, starts looking
awfully useful.
--
Dave Pooser
Manager of Information Services
Alford Media http://www.alfordmedia.com
