[148859] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Wed Jan 25 11:28:44 2012
X-Envelope-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:28:13 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <3B3D95F0-7E5E-417B-889B-3E5ABC660AD3@wisc.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 25/01/2012 16:15, Dale W. Carder wrote:
> I believe there is no need to replicate the headaches of rfc1918 in the
> next address-family eternity.
I wish you luck selling this notion to enterprise network people, most of
who appear to believe that rfc1918 address space is a feature, not a bug.
Nick
