[148802] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Mon Jan 23 10:31:26 2012
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:30:47 +0800
In-Reply-To: <20120120081435.GA17097@pob.ytti.fi>
Reply-To: mtinka@globaltransit.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart5189538.kLeTIXsrza
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Friday, January 20, 2012 04:14:35 PM Saku Ytti wrote:
> MX80 is not competing against ASR1k, and JNPR has no
> product to compete with ASR1k.
And this is something I've been telling Juniper for years=20
(not that they don't already know). The M7i and M10i have=20
really done all they can - but trying to get an Ethernet box=20
to do non-Ethernet things, while possible, is simply not=20
economically viable for operators (FlexWAN's, SIP's, MX=20
=46PC's, anyone?).
They really need to solve this one.
The MX80 had no competition from Cisco, until the ASR9001=20
came out (and it supports 40Gbps line cards when they come=20
out).
Juniper are dropping the ball on this one. But hopefully,=20
they're busy in the lab building a decent ASR1000=20
challenger.
Mark.
--nextPart5189538.kLeTIXsrza
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=dxud
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart5189538.kLeTIXsrza--