[148644] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Megaupload.com seized
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Stewart)
Thu Jan 19 19:07:49 2012
From: "Paul Stewart" <paul@paulstewart.org>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F18A6D9.6040703@paulgraydon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 19:07:03 -0500
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
For us (AS11666), about 3-4% of total traffic typically....
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Graydon [mailto:paul@paulgraydon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 6:27 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Megaupload.com seized
On 01/19/2012 12:41 PM, Ryan Gelobter wrote:
> The megaupload.com domain was seized today, has anyone noticed
> significant drops in network traffic as a result?
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/78786408/Mega-Indictment
> http://techland.time.com/2012/01/19/feds-shut-down-megaupload-com-file
> -sharing-website/
Ars Technica are implying it was quite a source of bandwidth usage within
companies. I'm curious, are any interesting charts on an ISP side?
http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/01/before-shutdown-megaupload-ate-
up-more-corporate-bandwidth-than-dropbox.ars
