[148628] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Thu Jan 19 16:39:08 2012
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
To: jon Heise <jon@smugmug.com>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:40:10 +0000
In-Reply-To: <44EDB6D0-C480-4232-8FCD-4124D152849B@smugmug.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jon Heise [mailto:jon@smugmug.com]
> Sent: 19 January 2012 21:37
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
>=20
> Does anyone have any experience with these two routers, we're looking
> to buy one of them but i have little experience dealing with cisco
> routers and zero experience with juniper.
I have lots of MX80s and they have all been fantastic. But if you have no =
experience of Juniper it will be a different learning curve (one that is, =
IMO, worth the effort).
I have not used the asr1000 but it looks like a capable box. You would do =
well to look at the MX80 fixed chassis, it comes with 48 1G interfaces and=
4 10G interfaces. They are pretty good value, I think.
--
Leigh Porter
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
