[148608] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: juniper mx80 vs cisco asr 1000
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Thomas Donnelly)
Thu Jan 19 15:35:42 2012
In-Reply-To: <44EDB6D0-C480-4232-8FCD-4124D152849B@smugmug.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:34:56 -0800
From: Thomas Donnelly <tad1214@gmail.com>
To: jon Heise <jon@smugmug.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I have used the ASR1002-F in a previous life and I was very pleased with
it. Performance was a massive increase from the 3845 we had. The warm
standby IOS is a nice feature for in service upgrades and crash avoidance.
I don't have much experience with the MX series of things but you would be
happy with the ASR assuming it meets your bandwidth/port
density requirements.
-=Tom
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:10 PM, jon Heise <jon@smugmug.com> wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with these two routers, we're looking to
> buy one of them but i have little experience dealing with cisco routers and
> zero experience with juniper.
>
