[148461] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Monday Night Footbal -- on Google?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cameron Byrne)
Sun Jan 15 16:52:08 2012
In-Reply-To: <3A75F85F-AE00-499E-9052-0005F506ADA6@puck.nether.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:51:18 -0800
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 15, 2012 1:40 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with Internet scale.
> >
> > Now scaling for your local environment embedded RP might be beneficial,
but
> > actual practical applications where you need ASM are very few.
> >
>
> Most vendors took out hardware multicast support and do it via
recirculation
> these days.
>
> I'm more interested in other topics, this would likely be served by a CDN,
> and I'm curious if any CDNs have started placing gear behind CGN/LSN.
>
CDNs have shown hesitation to receiving traffic from non-unique ipv4 space
despite the obvious benefits of CGN bypass.
Cb
> I've also noticed some hotels and other 'guest net' folks capturing
4.2.2.1
> and comparable open recursive name servers in-house. Two weeks ago I
could ping
> 4.2.2.1 and get responses when TTL was set to 1 on my outgoing packets.
>
> - Jared
