[148457] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: enterprise 802.11
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Meftah Tayeb)
Sun Jan 15 16:39:32 2012
From: "Meftah Tayeb" <tayeb.meftah@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael Rodriguez" <packetjockey@gmail.com>,
"Ken King" <kking@yammer-inc.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:58:45 +0200
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
cisco made the controller only to buy it?
ubiquity or Mikrotik.
END!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rafael Rodriguez" <packetjockey@gmail.com>
To: "Ken King" <kking@yammer-inc.com>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: enterprise 802.11
> I'd recommend Aruba. Not a fan of the Cisco wifi controller gear.
>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Ken King <kking@yammer-inc.com> wrote:
>
>> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>>
>> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile
>> phones.
>>
>> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
>> space.
>>
>> what are the thoughts these days on the best enterprise solution/vendor?
>>
>> Thanks for your replies.
>>
>>
>> Ken King
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 6797 (20120115) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6797 (20120115) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
