[148235] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: anycast load balancing issue
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson)
Fri Jan 6 02:16:55 2012
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:16:03 +0100
From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: Johannes Resch <jr@xor.at>
In-Reply-To: <4F05BDE1.3040103@xor.at>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--Jz4B0QKJ3xxfGEtb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: anycast load balancing issue Date: Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 04:12:=
33PM +0100 Quoting Johannes Resch (jr@xor.at):
> >Any clues?
=20
> Since you mention route-reflector route selection - are you already
> using per-VRF, per-PE route distinguishers for that L3VPN instance?
Problem solved - what I did not tell (shame on me) was that there are two
islands of IGP (growing pains...) redistributing to each other... The
metric in that redistribution was too low, resulting in artificially
"cheap" paths to the wrong places.
Thanks all who made me think a second round and solve this.=20
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
Hold the MAYO & pass the COSMIC AWARENESS ...
--Jz4B0QKJ3xxfGEtb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk8Gn7MACgkQ02/pMZDM1cXxtACfbKBlJJq2LCBLKnxHgq3s6NNT
K3oAnjMr/ukhjst9rLj+4DkKDn30NOb6
=k7rv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Jz4B0QKJ3xxfGEtb--
