[148155] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 resolvers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Wed Jan 4 15:22:13 2012
In-Reply-To: <EBA25509-B69D-41BD-86F4-04EFABBA53A1@dds.nl>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 15:21:24 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Seth Mos <seth.mos@dds.nl>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Seth Mos <seth.mos@dds.nl> wrote:
> Hi Nanog, Owen,
>
> I was wondering if many people are seeing horrendous latency on the free =
Hurricane Electric resolvers?
>
> Both accessing the v4 or v6 resolvers have horrendous latency. This could=
well be coupled to their free nature and popularity.
>
> So far when contacting Hurricane Electric they restart the resolver on th=
eir end and all is well again, but now other pfSense users in the US were n=
oticing these latency issues as well, leading me to believe it is a larger =
issue.
err, are all pfsense people automatically configured to use he's
servers? that seems sorta rude if so...
>
> But I was wondering if a more permanent solution for these resolvers exis=
t.
>
>
> =A074.82.42.42 =A0 =A0 2373 msec
> =A02001:470:20::2 =A02592 msec
>
> The google DNS server I'm using is doing swimmingly so far, OpenDNS seems=
ok too.
> =A02001:4860:4860::8844 =A0 =A016 msec
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Seth Mos
