[148120] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Jan 3 19:43:21 2012
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:19:08 PST."
<052FB5BB-4487-4940-87A7-0041A8AD6DF5@delong.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:40:53 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1325637653_5117P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:19:08 PST, Owen DeLong said:
> The implementation of IPv6 in a host MUST support SLAAC. That does not mean
> that the host must use that support in any particular environment.
The odd part is that the above paragraph is equally true if you replace SLAAC
with IPSec - but in *that* case nobody has an issue with it.
Just sayin'...
--==_Exmh_1325637653_5117P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFPA6AVcC3lWbTT17ARAuhGAJ4nCzJ1wUw0DJmieISwbSNuf+ognQCfQ7n8
AYe2GBdTfJw8t4qRB4+dUeA=
=w88x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1325637653_5117P--
