[148021] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Dec 29 20:27:17 2011
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:12:43 +1100."
<20111230011243.2BC201ABB7F7@drugs.dv.isc.org>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 20:24:59 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1325208299_3579P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:12:43 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
> Well I'd like to be able to plug in the cable router and the DSL
> router at home and have it all just work. Just because it is 0.2%
> today doesn't mean that it will be 0.2% in the future. As home
> users get more and more dependent on the internet working having
> diverse, independent network connectivity will become more and more
> important.
Agreed. But did you plug the cable router and the DSL router both
into your PC, or into yet another box that needs routing smarts and
then your PC just needs to know "talk to the smart box"?
(Hint - if the cable router and the DSL router are both plugged into
your PC, how do all the *other* devices in your house reach the internet? :)
--==_Exmh_1325208299_3579P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFO/RLrcC3lWbTT17ARApTrAJ4uolG/phDtE22QfDpBeupvM7s0KACfR84o
1+1FfxSP/YHxXelmZkILjqM=
=IzN/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1325208299_3579P--
