[148007] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Dec 29 11:12:59 2011
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:53:29 +0900."
<4EFC62C9.9030101@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:11:29 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1325175089_3579P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:53:29 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
> IGP snooping is not necessary if the host have only one next
> hop router.
You don't need an IGP either at that point, no matter what some paper from
years ago tries to assert. :)
--==_Exmh_1325175089_3579P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFO/JExcC3lWbTT17ARAk93AJ9KA8FIYuKx76zFfWIcny1oCfBQvQCeJ5Tv
fIipn5mQspGHcQUDwdrWhQs=
=9OXM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1325175089_3579P--
