[147993] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Misconceptions, was: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vitkovsky, Adam)
Thu Dec 29 05:28:42 2011
From: "Vitkovsky, Adam" <avitkovsky@emea.att.com>
To: Ray Soucy <rps@maine.edu>, Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:27:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CALFTrnNVZDoO+f8nJMPwAMFkeyL+Ov_h81=PHvV0X4WAbb=aFA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>... host systems should participate in IGP
>We tried that.
>It didn't scale well.
>The Internet today is very different than the Internet in 1981.
-did you? I thought CLNS with plethora of ip addresses compared to ipv4 was=
buried before it could be widely deployed, I was not around back than but =
would like to know why ES-IS did not scale well when integrated IS-IS is st=
ill used primarily for great scalability=20
