[147959] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IPTV and ASM

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike McBride)
Wed Dec 28 17:20:15 2011

In-Reply-To: <CAJNg7VJNRA2Q-q+yqq4zKsNi2f5ro=5CXEDdg6VWkqXTsVD2UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 14:19:14 -0800
From: Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com>
To: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

Marshall,

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Marshall Eubanks
<marshall.eubanks@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Mike;
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mike McBride <mmcbride7@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Anyone using ASM (versus SSM) for IPTV? If so why?
>>
>
> From what I understand, the answer is likely to be "yes" and the
> reason is likely to be "deployed equipment only
> supports IGMP v2."

Agreed. I'm seeking confirmation, from IPTV implementers, that non
igmpv3 support is the reason for using ASM with IPTV. Versus other
reasons such as reducing state. Or is this a non issue and everyone is
using SSM with IPTV?

thanks,
mike

> Regards
> Marshall
>
>> thanks,
>> mike
>>


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post