[147913] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Dec 27 16:54:56 2011
To: Tomas Podermanski <tpoder@cis.vutbr.cz>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:23:48 +0100."
<4EFA3764.1040000@cis.vutbr.cz>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:52:49 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1325022769_3579P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:23:48 +0100, Tomas Podermanski said:
> I agree with you. Deploying IPv6 is really not easy and not cheep as
> some IPv6 enthusiasts claims.
It's probably as easy and as cheap as IPv4 is. You've just forgotten
how expensive and painful it was to solve all the exact same problems
on the IPv4 side when you built your IPv4 infrastructure all those years ago.
Meanwhile, the IPv6 enthusasts have forgotten how hard it was
to deploy their IPv6 infrastructure all those years ago.
--==_Exmh_1325022769_3579P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFO+j4xcC3lWbTT17ARArNOAJ0R8PqXt39o5NPknXC/RKQkttL9SwCg71Uy
P+Wnvcl6N5kZJ5v+zaOqUjA=
=3oMU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1325022769_3579P--
