[147902] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Dec 26 12:59:09 2011
To: Ray Soucy <rps@maine.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST."
<CALFTrnNz-nB4oOGezxWkt=SxT0-8E3P8acGZDyaqsVO_spuaiA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:56:38 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1324922198_3579P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said:
> 2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>:
> > And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there
> > is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution.
> By who? Sources please.
> A few people on NANOG complaining about RA is pretty far from deprecation of RA.
Especially when some of the biggest IPv6 networks out there are still using
it pretty heavily.
(C''mon you guys, *deploy* already. It's pretty sad when people are arguing
about stuff like this, and a frikkin' cow college out in the boonies pushing
300-400mbits/sec of IPv6 off-campus is still a "large" deployment. It's
embarassing for the industry as a whole)
--==_Exmh_1324922198_3579P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFO+LVWcC3lWbTT17ARArAxAJ9+jxfM89lm9MxG1reEggrvoFVbdgCgmvCX
TxIQGI/u+1BjlEvqGsNXvLw=
=qOsu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1324922198_3579P--
