[147788] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Dec 21 20:50:50 2011
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:18:05 PST."
<9B747991-09CC-47E2-A245-846C3ABD9005@delong.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:48:00 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1324518480_2784P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:18:05 PST, Owen DeLong said:
> Perhaps you have not, but, others have. I have seen environments where
> SLAAC is much more useful than DHCPv6. I've seen environments where
> DHCPv6 is needed.
OK, I'll name names. If you have end users still running WinXP, getting them
at least somewhat working under SLAAC/DHCPv4 is a lot less headache than trying
to DHCPv6 them.
Anybody managed to stamp out WinXP in their end user population yet?
--==_Exmh_1324518480_2784P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFO8oxQcC3lWbTT17ARAt0hAJ4r3+5qKXMrnOUbSI32QtmODMsSegCfdf+H
nC6s8vDd8K7uv3YK8WEjnkQ=
=wuGq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1324518480_2784P--
