[147612] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: local_preference for transit traffic?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Dec 15 11:43:52 2011
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
To: Keegan Holley <keegan.holley@sungard.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:42:48 +0800
In-Reply-To: <CABO8Q6SrYXC7ZdaUK6YTxYPN_92wJt2LfZuEZ8qqRb_PxovGGA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Reply-To: mtinka@globaltransit.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart1414698.GzGe5KxCMc
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Friday, December 16, 2011 12:27:48 AM Keegan Holley=20
wrote:
> Forgive my ignorance, but are connections between ISP's
> normally billed by the bit? I'm a transit AS but not an
> ISP in the traditional sense, so I just have the normal
> monthly billing.=20
Per-bit billing, for us, is not a pre-requisite for us to=20
encourage traffic toward our customers to use the transit=20
link they purchase from us.
Mark.
--nextPart1414698.GzGe5KxCMc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABAgAGBQJO6iOLAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GTNYP/iXa7wobMxtmEqg/iaJfbAJj
A8TCU38cpROD/+QBXix2cWGNV6JjPBG7PxU0y35KLDlJIqF2pOPHedwpyQaSp7Wk
pwunJLB3nyFRcJeUOitO9PCQUgwxGhMKAHaKBw+o+q18rjPBUZCh4/jyyytCFibJ
s14wfzDh/ssJ5VPFhy26l+qQ8Kvv87nKdABT6Hc+7j1t+7wpSjsp1joyhARDW0TV
2HsePyaYlflUFkT+g+4of32uVV4g9FNKwSiG7PukGoyU8gcgOE8tRYfi4F1ZBR9V
mYTxnoPHgH4vnLwfcfbzVdMW4p/yfrDofI/+m64UGZe28x8E3gpCw+tJy4V8ltjc
jjLavH4UqOR425xpi74bXFhSiWh8bu8ug9YMv82oy6J/paltSvsJaNj2qqRwSulv
fTqIVFTmK/3in6l6dRFiVyP1RO+ja/0fFHU3ETuXMnD5pzRpIxRvMa5M0jHt3AEZ
9crV5DCYQUUKOsi0vosHuyS+tFFONjlifvrFzQa2zN5xLTzDcuBN9YjrfsoZdOhF
oJgFjQVOwUCPWpxS/HbQK4FnlGnvE6JDShR2e1PprGLRk4NW5cyw16WTSkbadbho
jOiAZKHRlh8HNCzP+Or1lIBfFd3AbYPU9WgcmVJN0Otu+fOfuqHqD6BmTK/gwscN
pXmw9BhzaLyqzw3buGU9
=Pa3Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1414698.GzGe5KxCMc--
