[147607] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: local_preference for transit traffic?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Dec 15 11:16:48 2011
From: Mark Tinka <mtinka@globaltransit.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 00:15:50 +0800
In-Reply-To: <20111215144237.GB73927@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Reply-To: mtinka@globaltransit.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart1799282.0xAiNIT8PI
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:42:37 PM Leo Bicknell=20
wrote:
> However, there may be a simpler explanation. If you bill
> by the bit as a transit provider it's in your best
> interest to make sure your customer gets as many bits
> through you as possible. Plus if you can fill their
> pipe, they need to buy an upgrade to you.
Indeed.
Mark.
--nextPart1799282.0xAiNIT8PI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=w5y4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1799282.0xAiNIT8PI--
