[147600] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: /128 IPv6 prefixs in the wild?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Thu Dec 15 09:41:10 2011
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 06:39:56 -0800
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPLq3UPwo0j3QDiSJLqsoOOPzaN_xmGyyzLGfic_DEC2H6mSRg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:24:56AM +0530, Glen Kent wr=
ote:
> What are the scenarios when IPv6 routers would learn a large number of
> /128 prefixes?
In addition to the loopback interfaces already mentioned, you may
also see "virtual addresses" of several kinds. For instance an
anycasted recursive resolver service may come in as a /128.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)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=3ry5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--
